Lamberton v. Connecticut Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Wi-nona county, Start, J., presiding, refusing a new trial. cited Walsh v. Hartford Fire Ins..Co., 73 N. Y. 5 ; Marvin v. Universal Life Ins. Co., 85 N. Y. 278 ; Hank-ins v. Rockford Ins. Co.', 70 Wis. 1; Gladding v. California, etc.. Ins. Ass’n, 66 Cal. 6; Kyte v. Commercial Union Assurance Co., 144 Mass. 43; Merserau v. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Go., 66 N. Y. 274; McIntyre v. Mich. State Ins.
Read the full summary
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Wi-nona county, Start, J., presiding, refusing a new trial. cited Walsh v. Hartford Fire Ins..Co., 73 N. Y. 5 ; Marvin v. Universal Life Ins. Co., 85 N. Y. 278 ; Hank-ins v. Rockford Ins. Co.', 70 Wis. 1; Gladding v. California, etc.. Ins. Ass’n, 66 Cal. 6; Kyte v. Commercial Union Assurance Co., 144 Mass. 43; Merserau v. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Go., 66 N. Y. 274; McIntyre v. Mich. State Ins. Co., 52 Mich. 188; Cleaver v. Traders’ Ins. Co., (Mich.) 32 N.W. Eep. 660; Insurance Co. v. Wolff, 95 U. S. 326; Enos v. Sun Ins. Co., 67 Cal.…
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The plaintiff recovered a verdict in this action upon a contract of fire insurance. This is an appeal from an order refusing a new trial. The construction and effect of the following provisions of the policy are to be considered: “If the premises hereby insured are or shall hereafter become vacated or unoccupied, and so remain for more than 10 days, * * * without notice to the company in each case, and consent indorsed hereon, * * * this policy shall be void. * * * This policy may be cancelled at any time at the request of the assured, the company retaining customary *130monthly short rates for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Morrison v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Viele v. Germania InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Westchester Fire Insurance v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Whited v. . Germania Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Renier v. Dwelling House InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- McElroy v. British America Assur. Co. of TorontoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- German Insurance v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Kahn v. Traders InsuranceWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.