Legal Opinion

Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Ass'n v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1996No. 69039PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kabpinski, Judge.

Appellant, city of Cleveland, appeals from the judgment of the common pleas court that issued a writ of mandamus compelling the city to disclose certain investigatory reports to appellee, Cleveland Police Patrolmen’s Association (“CPPA”). On appeal, the city argues that the trial court erred by issuing the writ, because one of the investigatory reports is exempt from public disclosure under Ohio law. For the following reasons, the judgment of the common pleas court is affirmed.

This dispute centers on an investigation as to whether city employees were improperly voiding…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Danis Clarkco Landfill Co. v. Clark County Solid Waste Management DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of MentorOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cincinnati Entertainment Associates, Ltd. v. Hamilton County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. v. MentorOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State Ex Rel. Strothers v. McFaulOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Toledo Police Patrolman's Assoc. v. Toledo, Unpublished Decision (3-10-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API