Brown v. Lamb
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This case is before us pursuant to the allowance of a motion to certify the record, and represents an action filed for the recovery of attorney fees. It has had a long and unusual history in the courts. We allowed the motion to certify because, in spite of the age of the litigation, it concerns the erroneous denial of a day in court for the appellant.
The journal entry in the Court of Appeals sets out the following pertinent facts:
“On March 24, 1969, the case was, after publication in the Toledo Legal News, dismissed for want of prosecution. Plaintiff’s counsel was actually aware of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- LaBarbera v. BatschOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Smith v. JaggersOhio Supreme Court · 1973
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. Judge George N. KiroffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Rahm v. HemsothOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
- Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. KiroffDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1975
- Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. Judge George N. KiroffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977