Rahm v. Hemsoth
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the Toledo Municipal Court sustaining defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint and defendant’s motion to quash service of summons. Plaintiffs filed their action in Municipal Court on Monday, May 5, 1975, claiming damages arising out of an automobile accident occurring on May 3, 1973. The application of Civil Rule 6(A) would have allowed plaintiffs to file their action on May 5th. It is the contention of the defendant-appellee that R. C. 1.14, rather than Civil Rule 6(A), is to be used in conjunction with statutes limiting the right to bring a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- LaBarbera v. BatschOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Draher v. WaltersOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Van Meter v. Segal-Schadel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- Brown v. LambOhio Supreme Court · 1973
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roach v. Vapor Station Columbus, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Elliott v. Fosdick & Hilmer, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Rowe v. BlissOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
- Antioch Co. Litigation Trust v. Morgan (In Re Antioch Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Cox v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.