Industrial Commission of Arizona v. Parise
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HATHAWAY, Judge.
The appellee, plaintiff in the court below, obtained a default judgment permanently enjoining the Commission from deducting unemployment benefits from workmen’s compensation benefits which the plaintiff and all others similarly situated might receive in the future. Briefly, the chronology is as follows.
In March, 1968, the plaintiff filed a complaint pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-946, alleging his dissatisfaction with an order of the Commission on the ground that it was unreasonable and unlawful. The record does not disclose when service upon the defendant Commission was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Adams v. PayneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Dillman v. DillmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- Moody v. Lloyd's of LondonArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Rathjen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Martin v. SearsArizona Supreme Court · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Blackmore v. BlackmoreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Robison v. Sales & Use Tax Division, State Tax CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Soltes v. JarzynkaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- O'Connor v. Howard P. Foley Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.