Soltes v. Jarzynka
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Judge.
Appellants have presented for review the issue of whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to set aside a default and default judgment. Because of the present procedural posture of this case, we are of the opinion that we do not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and that the appeal must be dismissed and the case remanded.
Appellants and appellees are neighbors in a residential subdivision of Maricopa County known as Sundown Ranch Estates. In early March, 1978, appellants commenced construction of an addition to their home. A significant portion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McKay v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Stevens v. Mehagian's Home Furnishings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Burkhardt v. BurkhardtArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Eaton Fruit Co. v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Pulaski v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Abril v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Wendling v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Sears Roebuck and Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- U-Totem Store v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Hyman v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.