Legal Opinion

Moody v. Lloyd's of London

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1944No. Civil No. 4619PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStanford, J.

In November, 1940, appellant was employed by the Red Rover Copper Company, and on entering the employment entered into a written renouncement rejecting the terms of the "Workmen’s Compensation Law, at which time the Red Rover Copper Company was carrying two insurance policies with the appellee, one policy being for the payment of benefits in the event of death or injury to the Red Rover Copper Company’s employees who had rejected the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and the other policy protecting the employer in the event an employee who had rejected said Act chose not to take…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Merrill v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Martin v. SearsArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. McLean v. TerritoryArizona Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Laclede Land & Improvement Co. v. CreasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  2. Andrew Brown Company v. Painters Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. Benderson-Wainberg Associates, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Byrer v. AB Robbs Trust CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Horne v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1961

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API