Legal Opinion

United States v. Hill

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 30, 1976No. CM 432841PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CLAUSE, Senior Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of two specifications of robbery and one specification of aggravated assault in violation of Articles 122 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 928 and 922, respectively.

*951There are several errors assigned by appellant which merit discussion.

Speedy Trial

In his first assigned error, appellant alleges, as he did at trial, a violation of the rule of United States v. Burton, 21 U.S.C. M.A. 112, 44 C.M.R. 166 (1971) in that he was not brought to trial until after 177 days of pretrial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  2. United States v. Cruz-RijosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. SturdivantUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. TriplettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  5. United States v. GaiterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BadgerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  2. United States v. RaineyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  3. United States v. RaineyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API