United States v. Sturdivant
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The accused contends that certain summaries of the trial proceedings, in the form of notes by the reporter, render the transcript of trial significantly nonverbatim and, consequentially, invalidate the bad-conduct discharge imposed by the court-martial. Article 19, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 819; United States v. Whitney, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 48, 48 C.M.R. 519 (1974). Reviewing the contention, the Court of Military Review concluded that the verbatim portion of the proceedings, before and after each note, provided “a sufficient statement” of each unrecorded…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Mayer v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. WeberUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. RichardsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
4Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. McCullahUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. LashleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. GrayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.