Legal Opinion

United States v. Sturdivant

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 9, 1976No. 31,115PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The accused contends that certain summaries of the trial proceedings, in the form of notes by the reporter, render the transcript of trial significantly nonverbatim and, consequentially, invalidate the bad-conduct discharge imposed by the court-martial. Article 19, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 819; United States v. Whitney, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 48, 48 C.M.R. 519 (1974). Reviewing the contention, the Court of Military Review concluded that the verbatim portion of the proceedings, before and after each note, provided “a sufficient statement” of each unrecorded…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayer v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. WeberUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  3. United States v. RichardsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

4Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. McCullahUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. LashleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. GrayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  5. United States v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API