White v. Fresno National Bank
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This action was brought to recover a balance alleged to be due from defendant to plaintiffs for the construction of its bank building in the city of Fresno. Plaintiffs are assignees of the contractor, and his contract was confined to the woodwork of the building. The contractor completed his work to the satisfaction of the architect, but the bank claims that it was not done within the time fixed by the terms of the contract, and by reason thereof it suffered damage in loss of rents, etc., and asks a set-off to that extent. Judgment went for the plaintiffs, a motion for a new trial was denied,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Yancy v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Rebman v. San Gabriel Valley Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Easton v. AshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Liuzza v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Scrimsher v. Reliance Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.