Legal Opinion
Allen v. Pennsylvania State Police
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 28, 1996PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
Gerald W. Allen (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police (Commissioner), denying his claim for benefits under the Heart and Lung Act (the Act).1 We affirm.
Claimant is a State Police Officer assigned to Troop S in York, Pennsylvania, and on July 10, 1994, he was scheduled to work the 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. shift. He arrived early for work and changed into his uniform in a locker room located in the State Police facility. State Police Officers are not required to arrive at work before their shift or use the locker room, but it is a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Colyer v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Brandt v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- City of Pittsburgh v. KisnerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- McLaughlin v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Rodgers v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Oliver v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.