Legal Opinion

City of Pittsburgh v. Kisner

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 15, 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The City of Pittsburgh (City) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) that reversed the arbitrator’s decision de nying Detective Edna Eisner’s (Claimant) petition seeking Heart and Lung Act benefits. 1 The City presents three issues for our review. First, whether Claimant timely filed a notice of appeal with the trial court, second, whether the trial court exceeded its standard of review, and third, whether the trial court properly determined that Claimant sustained an injury in the performance of official duties. Because the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. In Re Appeal of Borough of ChurchillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Wisniewski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Hills Department Store 59 v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Sparacino v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. King v. City of Philadelphia Bureau of Administrative AdjudicationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. M. Cook v. City of Philadelphia Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Commonwealth v. RichardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Narcotics Agents Regional Committee v. Office of Attorney GeneralCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Pennsylvania Builders Ass'n v. Carroll Valley Borough, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API