Legal Opinion

Oliver v. City of Pittsburgh

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 2009No. 1441 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge LEADBETTER.

The City of Pittsburgh (City) appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (common pleas) that denied its motion for summary judgment and granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of Casandra Oliver. By granting judgment in favor of Oliver, common pleas precluded the City from asserting a subrogation lien for Heart and Lung Act1 benefits paid to Oliver following her settlement of a civil action against a third party for injuries that she sustained in a work-related motor vehicle accident. After review, we reverse.

*1234The underlying…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Topelski v. Universal South Side Autos, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oliver v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Stermel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. City of Philadelphia v. F. ZampognaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. B. Tiano v. City of Philadelphia & PMA Mgmt. Corp. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. City of Philadelphia v. F. ZampognaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API