Legal Opinion

Brandt v. Pennsylvania State Police

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1993No. 325 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODGERS, Senior Judge.

Trooper Merrill D. Brandt appeals from an adjudication of the Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police denying Brandt’s claim for benefits under the Heart and Lung Act 1 (the Act). The Commissioner found Brandt to be permanently disabled and, therefore, ineligible for benefits. We reverse.

On September 17, 1975, Brandt was shot while attempting to serve an arrest warrant. He was disabled for approximately seven months. In 1976, Brandt’s treating physician, A.C. Makdad, M.D., advised the state police that Brandt should be placed on limited duty, because situations…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. COM., PENN. ST. POLICESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Camaione v. Borough of LatrobeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Palmeri v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Adams v. Lawrence Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Buchanan v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Colyer v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Allen v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. McLaughlin v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Rodgers v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Donnini v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API