Legal Opinion

Jones v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 1969No. 42823PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

The decisive issue for decision is whether plaintiffs alleged cause of action is barred by the Statute of Limitations.

In the trial court plaintiff, Ingram Jones, sued his former wife, Mary Francis Jones, and his two daughters, Marcia Ingram Smoke and Sperry Jones, for the cancellation of a deed he had executed conveying to the daughters an undivided one-half interest in 60 acres of real estate. He alleged that the consideration for the deed was his wife’s promise not to contest the divorce action he later filed in Venezuela; that the promise was fraudulently made with an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ocdike v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Catron v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. American National Bank of Enid v. CrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Seran v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Guyer v. LondonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cacy v. CacySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Howell Petroleum Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Samson Resources Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. Resolution Trust Corp. v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Baker v. PatteeUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Robert L. Kroenlein Trust ex rel. Alden v. KirchheferWyoming Supreme Court · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API