Legal Opinion

State v. Strasburger

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 3, 1996No. 9501-60669; CA A87503PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Appellant appeals an order finding him to be a mentally ill person and committing him to the Mental Health Division for treatment. The order is based on the trial court’s findings that appellant is dangerous to himself and is unable to provide for his basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(d). 1 Appellant •contends that the findings are not supported by clear and convincing evidence as required by ORS 426.130. We review de novo, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 545 P2d 97 (1976), and reverse.

Appellant was released from the Oregon State Hospital (OSH) in Salem on October 19, 1994, after being treated there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GjerdeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. ShorettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. DeMartinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. SaephanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API