Legal Opinion

State v. Shorett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 11, 2004No. 03C10173; A120492PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Appellant appeals a judgment declaring her to be a mentally ill person and committing her to the Mental Health Division. The trial court found that appellant was unable to provide for her basic needs and was not receiving such care as was necessary for her health or safety. See ORS 426.005(l)(d)(B); ORS 426.130. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3), 1 we reverse.

We consider the facts as they existed on January 23, 2003, the date of the hearing. State v. North, 189 Or App 518, 520, 76 P3d 685 (2003). At that time, appellant was being held at the Oregon State Hospital (OSH) in Salem. She had been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. LindeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. D. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. R. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. JuddCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. C. M. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. M.J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API