Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Stuttgart

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 22, 1993No. 92-849PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Justice.

This is an action challenging the validity of a tax exempt lease agreement between the City of Stuttgart and First Continental Financial Corporation on the grounds that the lease contains interest bearing evidence of indebtedness in violation of Ark. Const., art. 16, § 1. We find that it does and reverse the trial court.

The appellees, City of Stuttgart and First Continental Financial Corporation, entered into a lease agreement for a garbage truck. Stuttgart chose this method of acquisition because it did not have enough cash to purchase the garbage truck in one year. A…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Hot Springs v. CrevistonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Crumley v. BerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Gipson v. ManerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  5. Medalist Forming Systems, Inc. v. Malvern National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mountain Home School District No. 9 v. T.M.J. Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Priest v. PolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Riddick v. StreettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Gravett v. VillinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Oldner v. VillinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API