Osborn v. Hoyt
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. W. A. Anderson, Judge Presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiffs sued to have a trust declared in their favor to certain real property which, as alleged, had been deeded by Silas Hoyt, in fraud of" plaintiffs and in violation of their rights, to said Hoyt’s daughters, defendants Mary E. Hicks and Rachel H. Jolley, charged with full knowledge of the right of plaintiffs and of the fraud. The asserted rights of plaintiffs arose from a written agreement by the terms of which Silas Hoyt promised to make a will giving and devising to plaintiffs all of his right, title, and interest in and to the land in question which he then had or might thereafter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. CarkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Del Campo v. CamarilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Callahan v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hafemann v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Estate of RollsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Ludwicki v. GuerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Alberts v. American Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Estate of MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.