Callahan v. Broderick
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Injunction. A demurrer to the amended complaint was sustained, and the court gave judgment for defendant, dismissing the action, from which plaintiff appeals. The amended complaint alleges that plaintiff is a resident' of the city and county of San Francisco and a taxpayer therein and a contributor to and beneficiary of the fund mentioned in thé complaint; on July 7, 1897, the board of police relief and pension fund commissioners of said city and county “passed and approved, to wit, forty demands on said fund, among which aré four demands which are not lawful demands on said fund,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Branham v. Mayor & Common CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Ohm v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Aurrecoechea v. SinclairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by23 opinions
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Monahan v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.