Legal Opinion

Kucharczyk v. Regents of the University of California

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 11, 1996No. C-94-3886EFLPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LYNCH, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs, both scientists’ who formerly worked for the University of California San Francisco (“UCSF”), are suing the Regents of the University of California (“the University”), Nycomed Salutar (“Salutar” or “Ny-comed”), and Nycomed Imaging AS (“NIAS”), Salutar’s parent company, alleging. a number of theories in ten causes of action. Salutar has counterclaimed against plaintiffs and cross-claimed against the University.

This suit arises out of plaintiffs* invention of a process in the magnetic resonance imaging (“MRI”) field and the University’s…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  5. British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Franceschi v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Schooler v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Kucharczyk v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
  5. VAN DYKE v. WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCESDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API