Legal Opinion
Gumienny v. Hess
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1938No. Docket No. 59, Calendar No. 39,843PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.
Appellants, Edwin J. and.Carl T. Hess, copartners doing business as tbe Hess Cartage Company, urge that the judgment secured by Sophia Gumienny as next friend of Anthony Gumienny, a minor, against the City of Detroit, Department of Street Railways, in which the said copartners were joined as alleged joint tortfeasors, is conclusive of the question of liability and precludes any recovery against said Hess Cartage Company in this action brought by Anthony’s father for his consequential damages suffered by reason of the injury to his son. It is their contention that the father of an injured…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. EmeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Giedrewicz v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Thompson v. United Laboratories Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Lundergan v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Berger v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Bostrom v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Jordan v. CA Roberts CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Geiger v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.