Legal Opinion
Busby v. Simmons
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided August 6, 1991No. 9010SC1196PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in State Farm’s favor. For the following reasons, we hold that the trial court did not err and affirm the order of 6 September 1990.
Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 56(c) (1990), summary judgment shall be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” This remedy permits the trial court to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Walker v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Buckner v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Crowder v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Dixon v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Economy Insurance Co. v. BogdahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Concrete Services, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Economy Preferred Insurance v. Jersey County Construction, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Rohe Ex Rel. Rohe v. CNA Ins. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Foote v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.