Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Gunter

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 25, 1982PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ABRIDGED

OPINION

TODD, Presiding Judge,

Middle Section. (With the concurrence of participating judges, the original opinion has been abridged for publication.)

This is an interlocutory appeal for which permission was granted by the Trial Court and this Court. Plaintiff sued for wrongful death of her husband, Alfred Wayne Dixon, in an automobile collision. Named as defendants were George E. Gunter, an alleged uninsured motorist involved in the collision and Continental Insurance Company, a subsidiary of which had issued an automobile policy containing uninsured motorist coverage to Nashville Stone…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kaysen v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Polzin v. Phoenix of Hartford InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. General Insurance Co. of America v. Icelandic Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. J & W FOODS CORP. v. State Farm Mut. Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  2. American Economy Insurance Co. v. BogdahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. Buckner v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Concrete Services, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Michigan Township Participating Plan v. PavolichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API