Legal Opinion
Ledesma v. Jack Stewart Produce, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 5, 1987No. 85-2438PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Alfonso Ledesma, Josephine Rodriguez, Rafaela Gaytan, and Jennifer Santiago seek review of the district court’s dismissal of their personal injury claim on the ground that the statute of limitations had run. They argue that under the California choice-of-law rules the district court should not have applied the one-year California statute of limitations to their claim. They further argue that, even if the California statute of limitations was properly applied, the district court should have tolled it pursuant to Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 351 (West 1982). We agree with the first…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Coufal Abogados Eric Coufal v. At&t, Inc. Lucent Technologies Inc.,defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hambrecht & Quist Venture Partners v. American Medical International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Arno v. Club Med Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Aalmuhammed v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Bates v. Superior Court, Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1988
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.