Legal Opinion

Yankee v. Apv North America, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 3, 2011No. 64312-6-I, 65019-0-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

f In Braaten v. Saberhagen Holdings, 165 Wn.2d 373, 380, 198 P.3d 493 (2008), the Washington Supreme Court held that a manufacturer has no duty under products liability or negligence principles to warn of the exposure to asbestos-containing replacement parts that it did not manufacture, sell, or supply. Sandra Yankee, individually and as the personal representative of the estate of Dennis Yankee (Yankee); and Renata Needles, individually and as the personal representative of the estate of her father, Witold Siemieniec (Siemieniec), both filed lawsuits against a number of manufacturers,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Simonetta v. Viad Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Braaten v. Saberhagen HoldingsWashington Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Washburn v. City of Federal WayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Ericka M. Rickman v. Premera Blue CrossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Washburn v. City of Federal WayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Yankee v. APV North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API