Legal Opinion

Merex A.G. Merex Corporation and Peter C. Lachmann v. Fairchild Weston Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 14, 1994No. 1817, Docket 93-9286PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge:

Merex A.G. (“Merex”) appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Mary Johnson Lowe, Judge) dismissing its complaint seeking damages under an oral commission agreement. Merex argues, among other things, that the district court abused its discretion by declaring the jury verdict on its promissory estoppel claim advisory only, under Federal Rule 39(c), and by waiting until Merex rested its case before announcing this ruling.

We hold that the Seventh Amendment did not guarantee Merex the right to a jury trial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Colleen P. Kramer v. Banc of America Securities, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Darby Trading Inc. v. Shell International Trading & Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  3. In Re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Alexander v. Gerhardt Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Redmond v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API