State v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, Minn.St. 609.-342(b), 1 and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum term of 20 years in prison. On this direct appeal, defendant raises issues relating to delay by the prosecution in charging him and bringing him to trial, the admissibility of certain other-crimes evidence, the propriety of a pretrial protective order, and the propriety of the court’s refusal to permit defendant to introduce certain evidence. We affirm.
1. Defendant’s first contention is that his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. WermerskirchenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. QuattrocchiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- State v. PignoletSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
- State v. CrockerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.