Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility District
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 12, 1992No. 16-89-00028; CA A66055PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Plaintiff was discharged from her job at Emerald People’s Utility District (Emerald). She prevailed on federal civil rights and breach of contract claims in a jury trial. Defendants appeal. We affirm the judgment only in part.
We state the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Or Const, Art VII (amended), § 3; Standard Prod. Co. v. ICN United Med. Labs, 279 Or 633, 635, 569 P2d 594 (1977); Griffin v. Tri-Met, 112 Or App 575, 577, 831 P.2d 42 (1992). Plaintiff began working for Emerald in 1985. She worked there for three years as a data entry clerk and in customer services, until she…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Farmers Insurance v. TrutanichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Estes v. Lewis and Clark CollegeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Larmanger v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Lovejoy Specialty Hospital, Inc. v. Advocates for Life, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.