Legal Opinion
Matter of Radigan v. O'Connell
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 15, 1952PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
We agree with the Appellate Division that there is no substantial evidence to support the determination of the State Liquor Authority that the licensee has ceased to conduct a bona fide restaurant in violation of section 118 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. Under our view of the record, there is substantial evidence to support the determination of the State Liquor Authority that the licensee suffered or permitted the sale of an alcoholic beverage to an intoxicated person in violation of section 65 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law (Matter of Avon Bar & Grill v. O’Connell, 301 N. Y.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Avon Bar & Grill, Inc. v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Matter of Rumsey Manufacturing Corp. (Corsi)New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Matter of Bolani v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Matter of Menick v. BruckmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Flynn v. Board of Trustees of New York City Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Erin Wine & Liquor Store, Inc. v. O'ConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Club 95, Inc. v. New York State Liqour AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- People v. Bevilacqua, New York County Courts1958
- Leogrande v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.