Leogrande v. State Liquor Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBreitel, J.
Petitioner’s restaurant liquor license was can-celled by the .State Liquor Authority and he brings this proceeding under article 78 of -CPLR to review the determination. The evidence before the agency, if competent, was ample to substantiate the charges that the licensee engaged on and off *227the licensed premises in professional gambling activities, namely, bookmaking and policy collections. Petitioner contends, however, that the evidence establishing the charges was not competent because such evidence was the product of illegal search and seizure by police officers. The police officers,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Frank v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Ohio Ex Rel. Eaton v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People ex rel. Piccarillo v. New York State Board of ParoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In re WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Board of License Commissioners of Tiverton v. PastoreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
- In Re Property Seized From FlowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.