Legal Opinion
Club 95, Inc. v. New York State Liqour Authority
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 12, 1968PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Notwithstanding the several self-contradictions and the general unreliability of the testimony of the complaining witness, Spencer, there was substantial evidence to sustain the determination by the Authority, the sole arbiter of the issues of fact (Matter of Radigan v. O’Connell, 304 N. Y. 396, 399; Matter of Avon Bar & Grill v. O’Connell, 301 N. Y. 150, 153). Moreover, where the licensee’s agent is instrumental in creating the disorder, it is generally not necessary to establish a foreseeable pattern of conduct (Matter of Conservative Grouping Corp. v. Epstein, 10 N Y 2d 956;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Avon Bar & Grill, Inc. v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Matter of Radigan v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- People v. HawkNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- People v. Hawk, New York County Courts1935
3Cited by15 opinions
- Awrich Restaurant, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- La Vigna Restaurant Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Manhattan Scene, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Bryan & Rose, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Oudemool v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.