Firszt v. Kalinowski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
The appeal is brought under General Statutes, § 5840, from the denial of the motion to set aside the verdict. The failure of the appellant to make the evidence a part of the record prevents our passing upon the-claimed error of the court in denying the appellant’s motion to set aside the verdict. Kirkbride v. Bartz, 82 Conn. 615, 74 Atl. 888. The other grounds of appeal, alleged errors in the charge, in the ruling on evidence, and for mispleading, cannot be considered under this appeal, by which the single question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict is before us. Errors…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White v. HowdSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- McCaffrey v. Groton & Stonington Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Kirkbride v. BartzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- State v. BoucherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- State v. WeinribSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953