Legal Opinion

Smith v. Housing Authority

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 30, 1956PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.

Mary Smith and William Smith brought this action against' the defendant. Subsequently, William died, and it was agreed that the ease might be tried as if Mary were the sole plaintiff. The trial was to the jury, who returned a plaintiff’s verdict. Thereafter the defendant filed two motions, one to set the verdict aside and the other for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Both were denied by the court, and the defendant has appealed from the judgment then rendered.

Assignments of error are addressed to the denial of the two motions referred to. Contrary to the former practice, which required…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Castaldo v. D'ERAMOSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  2. Shegda v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. Fogarty v. M. J. Beuchler & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Berman v. KlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  5. Boiselle v. RogoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Moriarty v. LippeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Panaroni v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  4. State v. KeatingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  5. Petrizzo v. Commercial Contractors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API