Kirkbride v. Bartz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover the amount of a non-negotiable promissory note, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Litchfield County where a demurrer to the complaint was overruled and the cause was afterward tried to the jury before Welch, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.
The plaintiff’s amended complaint states that “on March 5, 1898, the defendant, by her note, promised to pay the plaintiff 8300 one year after date with interest at the rate of six per cent, per annum. Before the execution and delivery of said note the plaintiff lent to the defendant 8300, and said note was executed and delivered to the plaintiff by the defendant in consideration of and as evidence of said loan.”
The answer denied the allegations of the complaint, and also averred that the plaintiff loaned a sum of money, to the husband of the defendant, and took in return a conditional bill…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brown v. Woodward Et Ux.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Lord v. RussellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
3Cited by8 opinions
- Solari v. SeperakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- State v. WeinribSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Dwyer v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- McCann v. McGuireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.