Legal Opinion

People v. Seneca Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 2010No. G043026PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

In this bail forfeiture action, defendant Seneca Insurance Company (Seneca) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment and concomitant denial of Seneca’s motion to vacate forfeiture and exonerate bail or, alternatively, toll the time available for exoneration of bail. We affirm.

FACTS

Seneca, through its bail agent, posted a bail bond in the amount of $100,000 to secure the release of criminal defendant Dong Suk Kim on March 20, 2008. Kim failed to appear for his arraignment on September 9, 2008, and the court ordered bail forfeited in open court. Notice of forfeiture…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. Lexington National Ins. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. Fairmont Specialty GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. Far West InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. County of Orange v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. TingcungcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. Financial Casualty & Surety, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. Int'l Fid. Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. Western InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. International Fidelity Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API