Legal Opinion

People v. Fairmont Specialty Group

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 2009No. B204778PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANELLA, J.

Appellant Fairmont Specialty Group raises the issue whether the forfeiture of a bail bond which occurs when a defendant fails to appear at a scheduled criminal hearing should be set aside under Penal Code section 1305, subdivision (c)(2) when, within 185 days of the declaration of forfeiture, the defendant is arrested on an unrelated offense, the outstanding bench warrant is discovered by the arresting authorities, but the defendant is released at the behest of law enforcement officials in whose jurisdiction the original crime occurred. We conclude that under the facts…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In Re MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. County of Los Angeles v. Williamsburg National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. Western InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Fairmont Specialty GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. North River InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API