Legal Opinion

Asplin v. Mueller

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 1984No. 82CA0668PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN CISE, Judge.

In this assault and battery and outrageous conduct action, judgment was entered on a jury verdict awarding compensatory and exemplary damages to plaintiffs, Jennifer Asplin and Donald J. Leidy. Contending that the trial court deprived him of his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, defendant, Daniel T. Mueller, appeals. We affirm.

Most of the pertinent facts were stipulated, and the evidence as to facts not stipulated was uncontroverted. Defendant was a Denver police officer. He was required to be armed at all times, whether on or off duty and whether in or out…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. StjernholmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. RobnettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. State v. ChristensenCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. in Interest of M.H-KColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. In Re the Marriage of HoytColorado Court of Appeals · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API