Legal Opinion
State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Stjernholm
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 7, 1997No. 96SC44PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
We granted certiorari to review whether the court of appeals was correct in determining res judicata to be inapplicable to this case and in ordering trial of the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) (section 1983) claims of the plaintiffs-respondents, Dr. Alvin and Ms. Elsie Stjemholm, 1 against the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, and William Dold, Richard Ratliff, Melanie Tiahrt, Michelle Lucero, and Randy Baca, in their official capacities (collectively “the Board”). The court of appeals also ordered trial of Stjern-holm’s section 1983 claim against Assistant Attorney General Linda Baker who…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Trinidad School District No. 1 v. Lopez Ex Rel. LopezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- v. MeagherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- Czechorowski v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Carney v. Civil Service CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Jordan v. Maxim Healthcare ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.