Legal Opinion
Display Works, LLC v. Bartley
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 25, 2016No. Civil Action No. 16-583PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MADELINE COX ARLEO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants Michael Bartley and Derse, Inc,’s (“Derse”) (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Display Works, LLC’s (“Display Works” or “Plaintiff’) complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2). Dkt. No. 13, Because the Court finds that it has specific jurisdiction over Bartley, but it does not have personal jurisdiction over Derse, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
I, Factual Background
In this suit, Display Works sues its former west coast…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- MaxLite, Inc. v. ATG Electronics, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Linus Holding Corp. v. Mark Line Indus., LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Ontel Products Corp. v. Mindscope ProductsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Gorton v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Bors v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.