Legal Opinion

Dardanell v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The Workmen’s Compensation Act, inter alia, provides for liability when, at the time of the injury, an employee is performing services growing out of and incidental to his employment; and that an employee *252going to and from his employment in the ordinary and usual way, while on the premises of his employer, shall be deemed to be performing such service. Sec. 102.03 (1) (c) 1, Stats.

We have previously interpreted an employer’s parking lot to be encompassed within the term, “premises.” American Motors Corp. v. Industrial Comm. (1962), 18 Wis. 2d 246, 118 N. W. 2d 181; Cmelak v. Industrial Comm.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neese v. State Medical Society of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Krebs v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. American Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Cmelak v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Charney v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dardanell v. DEPT. INDUSTRY, LABOR & HU. RELSWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API