Peterson v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Defendant challenges the judgment on these grounds: (1) The award of damages was excessive; (2) plaintiff’s counsel made allegedly improper statements upon argument to the jury and the trial court did not take adequate measures to protect defendant from resulting prejudice; (3) plaintiff’s counsel discussed the defense interposed by defendant with defendant’s insured before defendant’s counsel had the opportunity to do so; (4) the court did not correctly submit to the jury the issue of whether plaintiffs injury was caused intentionally by the insured. We conclude that the evidence does not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sheehan v. GorianskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Diemel v. WeirichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Kincannon v. National Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by18 opinions
- Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Pachucki v. Republic Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Crull v. GlebMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- K.A.G. Ex Rel. Carson v. StanfordCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. MuthNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.