Legal Opinion

Estate of Quackenbush

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1975No. Civ. 15342PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAMURA, Acting P. J.

Under the terms of a lease executed during her lifetime by Marjorie W. Quackenbush (hereinafter decedent), the lessees (Sam and Philip Kelber) were granted a so-called “option to purchase” the leased property. After decedent’s death, the executors of her estate notified the Kelbers of their decision to sell the property on terms offered by the Kelbers’ sublessee, triggering the Kelbers’ exercise of their contractural “right of first refusal.” The executors reported the Kelbers’ election to purchase to the probate court and petitioned for an order confirming the sale…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bewick v. MechamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. In re the Estate of PearsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Estate of BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Richfield Oil Corp. v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. In re Estate DurhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Campbell v. AlgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Patterson v. GreenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Loftin v. Estate of LoftinNevada Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API