Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Alger

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1999No. B115217PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J. *

Here we hold that when a public entity condemns land for a public purpose, a private party’s right of first refusal to purchase the property is not triggered. Condemnation is an involuntary talcing preempting the private contractual right in the instant cotenant agreement. The right of first refusal is triggered only by a voluntary determination to sell in the absence of public need.

Daniel M. Campbell (Campbell) appeals from the judgments after the trial court sustained the demurrer of respondent Ventura County Flood Control District (District) to his first amended complaint…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Draper v. GochmanTexas Supreme Court · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Benefit Realty Corp. v. City of Carrollton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  2. In Re BergtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 1999
  3. Smyth v. Berman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Bill Signs Trucking, LLC v. Signs Family Limited PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Hartzheim v. Valley Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API