Legal Opinion

Richfield Oil Corp. v. Security-First National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1958No. Civ. 22483PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

Plaintiff Richfield Oil Corporation, hereinafter called “Richfield,” appeals from an adverse judgment in its action for declaratory relief and for specific performance. Defendant Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles is the executor of the estate of William L. Haskell, deceased, and will be hereinafter referred to as the 11 Executor. ’ ’ Defendant Elsam Company, a corporation, hereafter referred to as “Elsam,” was the highest bidder for the decedent’s real property at a probate sale thereof.

Richfield was the lessee and occupant of the real property so sold to Elsam. A lease dated…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bewick v. MechamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hefferan v. FreebairnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Wilson v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Craig v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Nelson v. ReisnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Schwartz v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Loughan v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Maron v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API