Mullet v. Wayne-Dalton Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DOWD, District Judge.
Before the Court are fully briefed cross-motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 20, 34). 1 For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion (Doc. No. 34) is denied and defendant’s motion (Doc. No. 20) is granted with respect to plaintiffs federal and state law claims of pregnancy discrimination. Plaintiffs remaining state law claims are dismissed without prejudice.
I. BACKGROUND
On December 5, 2003, plaintiff, Tori Mullet filed this action against her former employer, Wayne-Dalton Corp., alleging that her employment had been terminated on or about June…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McFee v. Nursing Care Management of America, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- Bare v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
- McFee v. Nursing Care Management of America, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010