Legal Opinion

Bare v. Federal Express Corp.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 15, 2012No. Case No. 5:11-cv-120PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

SARA LIOI, District Judge.

Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Federal Express Corp. (“defendant” or “Federal Express”). (Doc. No. 37.) Plaintiff Georgiann Bare (“plaintiff’ or “Bare”) has filed a brief in opposition (Doc. No. 44), to which defendant has replied. (Doc. No. 45.) Also before the Court is plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint and defendant’s opposition thereto. (Doc. Nos. 60, 66.)1 For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs motion to amend is DENIED and defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.

*603I. BACKGROUND

Bare…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kovac v. Superior Dairy, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  2. B&S Transport, Inc. v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
  3. Palmer v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Anderson v. AccuScripts Pharmacy, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company v. Dependable Painting CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API