Legal Opinion

Vincent Chiodo v. General Waterworks Corporation, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 3, 1967No. 8876PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Circuit Judge.

This case was tried to a jury and submitted upon special interrogatories under Rule 49(a). Judgment was entered upon the answers to the special interrogatories in favor of the appellee (defendant below) and the appeal is from that judgment.

Appellants, who were plaintiffs in the trial court, brought the action for rescission of a corporate stock transaction or in the alternative to recover damages by reason of the alleged violation by appellee-defendant of Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 (Title 17, C.F.R. Section 240.10b-5) promulgated pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited28 opinions

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
Estate Counseling Service, Inc., a Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
Franklin v. SheltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
Dunn v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
Miller v. BrazelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
Jung Ja Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
Acton Co., Inc. Of Massachusetts v. Bachman Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
United States v. David F. Brown, Tore T. Debella, Richard A. Reizen, Robert F. EhrlingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.