Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Hidden Splendor Mining Co.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided January 2, 1959No. C-56-57Published
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSON, District Judge.
Enough already has been mentioned concerning the general nature of the case in ruling on a pre-trial motion, Morgan v. Hidden Splendor Mining Co., D.C.D. Utah, Cent. D., 155 F.Supp. 257, to make an extended introductory statement unnecessary.
The case has now been tried to a jury. By the charge, the jury was advised that on the undisputed facts defendant had done $78,941 worth of work to which it was entitled to credit as against its $200,-000 exploration obligation. Answers to special interrogatories submitted with the general verdict indicated the jury’s view that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hudspeth v. SchmelzerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Bernstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Wilkin v. Shell Oil Co. Shell Oil Co. v. WilkinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Chapman v. BowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. Robison ex rel. Local 445, Oil Workers International UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.