Legal Opinion

Ehorn v. Podraza

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 19, 1977No. 76-91PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nash

After a bench trial in the circuit court of Du Page County, the defendant, Peter Podraza, was determined to be the father of Troy Ehorn, the child bom to plaintiff, Janet Ehom, in a proceeding under the Paternity Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 106 3/4, par. 51 et seq.

The defendant appeals contending the trial court erred in denying his request for trial by jury and his motion for a change of venue. We agree.

On April 1, 1975, plaintiff filed her complaint pursuant to the Paternity Act, asking that defendant be found to be the father of her child and seeking maternity expenses, child support…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alsen v. StonerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  2. People Ex Rel. Dalman v. O'MALLEYAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  3. People Ex Rel. Perz v. SchneemilchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. People Ex Rel. Harris v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roe v. DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People Ex Rel. Cizek v. AzzarelloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Carter v. Mullally (In Re Mullally)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  4. Roque v. FrederickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Hamilton ex rel. Ceasar v. CeasarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API